Back
Juan Alvarez

I guess that spacing between more projects, but it's more a general feeling

Shitposter and "like to talk to AI" doesn't sound super professional (what one would typically look for in freelance contractors).

Superstars can afford that "branding" (or whatever you want to call it), but most of us can't. I'd suggest a stronger bio outlining why anyone would contract you.

As for the projects page, it feels a bit cramped, and the stats page appears empty.

Good luck!

When you said the project page is a bit cramped, do you mean the spacing between projects or the spacing between project elements (like the description card)?

I guess that spacing between more projects, but it's more a general feeling

Privatily looks interesting, is what you have used? Happy with it?

AFAIK there are a number of libraries to transform sheets into MusicXML, not sure how well they work, but what you say makes sense initially. That said:

  • iPad only might be very limiting, most people doesn't have one.
  • Play along a music sheet has been done already; not sure if that is the end goal, or just a learning project (which is fine), but if you want a chance at capturing interest I think you need to offer something more.

For inspiration / reference, Adrian Holovaty's Soundslice is pretty great: www.soundslice.com/

The reference is great. Trying to build something like this. I guess I can make a webapp and turn it into a PWA or use it in WebView for native apps.

I use MailerLite. It's a bit crap tbh, UX very old looking. But has free tier and cheap afterwards.

This looks cool and messaging is clear, but I think you need to put this in front of you target audience to answer the questions you have.

I guess that companies with dedicated devOps roles have 5-10 employees at least, so pricing must remove as much friction as possible for them... I imagine a company would want to use at least 2-3 tasks per candidate, and interview at least 10-20 people per role, so bundles of 3/10/20 tasks seem super small to me, but maybe I am wrong!

Hey Juan!
Super valid point that I wasn't really thinking about. I've been focusing so much on being cheaper than competition at least to start with... I'll do some research on those numbers and adjust the bundles accordingly!

Thanks a lot for the input!

I never used any kind of these tools, so the tagline was also a bit confusing for me (i.e. I didn't know what the product was for judging from the tagline alone)

I'll give my humble vote to just "Showcase Everything You Create" – for me is shorter and more clear. The "You are" part reads a bit forced and vague.
The sub-headline could also be shorter, f.ex. "a place where your audience can connect with you through interactive widgets"

Disclaimer: I am not a marketer!

Other than that, the landing page looks good to me! Good luck!

Thanks for your feedback 🙂

What are your thoughts on this version:

Your Personal Page to:
Be Seen. Be Heard.
Be Creative. Be You.
Create a page where your audience can truly connect with your creativity through interactive Widgets.

I'm also no marketer by any means - figuring things out as I go. Really appreciate your input 🚀

or 🤔

Your Personal Page to:
Express and Monetize
Your Creativity
Create a page where your audience can truly connect with your creativity through interactive Widgets.

I was referring to the fact that (based on price escalation) you want to sell 360 videos in bulk, and that requires a respectable lump sum... not saying is necessarily expensive, just significant to just buy it without more concrete proof. The argument for selling 360 in bulk is good (why not 365 though?)

As for whether it is actually expensive or not: I have no idea!, but as a customer I'd stack this up against other AI-based tools, not a professional video production service.

Your comment on going from 0 to 15000 followers is very telling! When you say "helped me grow" you mean you did other things as well, or just this? Because that makes for a great selling point

Different things work for different people, and at different stages too.

Many methods are small variations of roughly the same thing just with a different name, and many principles of ALG are valid. But:

I don't buy the core idea of natural learning only, and I say it by experience. We idealize massively how kids learn; just because they don't complain so loudly it doesn't mean that languages are not hard for them – some kids actually struggle a lot, and they progress really, really, really slowly.

Genuine directed study – specially below B2 – is pretty damn useful, and there is a ton of evidence of it.

Home
Search
Messages
Notifications
More