Back
Juan Alvarez

This looks cool and messaging is clear, but I think you need to put this in front of you target audience to answer the questions you have.

I guess that companies with dedicated devOps roles have 5-10 employees at least, so pricing must remove as much friction as possible for them... I imagine a company would want to use at least 2-3 tasks per candidate, and interview at least 10-20 people per role, so bundles of 3/10/20 tasks seem super small to me, but maybe I am wrong!

Hey Juan!
Super valid point that I wasn't really thinking about. I've been focusing so much on being cheaper than competition at least to start with... I'll do some research on those numbers and adjust the bundles accordingly!

Thanks a lot for the input!

I never used any kind of these tools, so the tagline was also a bit confusing for me (i.e. I didn't know what the product was for judging from the tagline alone)

I'll give my humble vote to just "Showcase Everything You Create" – for me is shorter and more clear. The "You are" part reads a bit forced and vague.
The sub-headline could also be shorter, f.ex. "a place where your audience can connect with you through interactive widgets"

Disclaimer: I am not a marketer!

Other than that, the landing page looks good to me! Good luck!

Thanks for your feedback 🙂

What are your thoughts on this version:

Your Personal Page to:
Be Seen. Be Heard.
Be Creative. Be You.
Create a page where your audience can truly connect with your creativity through interactive Widgets.

I'm also no marketer by any means - figuring things out as I go. Really appreciate your input 🚀

or 🤔

Your Personal Page to:
Express and Monetize
Your Creativity
Create a page where your audience can truly connect with your creativity through interactive Widgets.

I was referring to the fact that (based on price escalation) you want to sell 360 videos in bulk, and that requires a respectable lump sum... not saying is necessarily expensive, just significant to just buy it without more concrete proof. The argument for selling 360 in bulk is good (why not 365 though?)

As for whether it is actually expensive or not: I have no idea!, but as a customer I'd stack this up against other AI-based tools, not a professional video production service.

Your comment on going from 0 to 15000 followers is very telling! When you say "helped me grow" you mean you did other things as well, or just this? Because that makes for a great selling point

Different things work for different people, and at different stages too.

Many methods are small variations of roughly the same thing just with a different name, and many principles of ALG are valid. But:

I don't buy the core idea of natural learning only, and I say it by experience. We idealize massively how kids learn; just because they don't complain so loudly it doesn't mean that languages are not hard for them – some kids actually struggle a lot, and they progress really, really, really slowly.

Genuine directed study – specially below B2 – is pretty damn useful, and there is a ton of evidence of it.

I agree with this. It would be good to see a few full examples, ideally with proof of how actual videos perform - there are a few claims that need some demonstration at that price point.

If there is a little degree of control, it would be great to know. Can you nudge the thing to make a video based of some copy, concrete ideas? Can you tell it the style (funny, bold, informative, chilling, etc)?

I also, I don't

Other than that, I just noticed a typo in "Profesionnal"

Hey Juan :) like you, people have asked me to add case studies;showcasing brands, displaying a few example videos (around five), and sharing performance metrics. I agree that this would be valuable, and I’ll be working on it.

when you say " there are a few claims that need some demonstration at that price point," do you feel it’s too expensive or too cheap?

Pricing psychology is interesting, some people might perceive it as too affordable to be high-quality. My goal was to make the product highly accessible, but I’ve also heard feedback that ~$1 per video seems surprisingly low, considering that a human video editor, especially in Europe, where editing alone can cost €200–€300.

--> Your perspective on pricing would be really helpful.

Regarding the level of control, my focus is on keeping the tool simple and efficient. I want users to spend just a few minutes describing their product, setting video objectives, highlighting key benefits and features, and providing basic details like their business name and URL. The AI then applies a proven framework—one that helped me grow my personal channel from 0 to 15,000 followers. This method has been particularly effective for marketing and product showcase videos.

And thanks for catching that typo—I’ve fixed it! 😊

I was referring to the fact that (based on price escalation) you want to sell 360 videos in bulk, and that requires a respectable lump sum... not saying is necessarily expensive, just significant to just buy it without more concrete proof. The argument for selling 360 in bulk is good (why not 365 though?)

As for whether it is actually expensive or not: I have no idea!, but as a customer I'd stack this up against other AI-based tools, not a professional video production service.

Your comment on going from 0 to 15000 followers is very telling! When you say "helped me grow" you mean you did other things as well, or just this? Because that makes for a great selling point

Stripe can do this automatically for you, and they do it based on IP address, as far as I know.

So yeah, get the Geolocation and then use some API for the currency conversion (don't know if there is any free).

Thanks, I will see if LemonSqueezy offers the same, as it was acquired by Stripe.

Oooh this is really good information, thanks! I'll pass this along to my clients.

Unfortunately, LemonSqueezy doesn't offer this feature yet.

Exactly, I think many long terms users managed to create a setup and workflow that work for them, and they are just happy with that.
I'm sure there are many use cases that I am not aware of.

Anki pretty much popularized spaced repetition after all, much more than SuperMemo.

Many! :)

Summarizing a lot, there is a massive different between a generic tool "for anything" and a custom one for a specific field – let that be languages, chess, music, or whatever.

F. ex. Anki is not suited for long-form content, dealing with audio is a pain, won't let you do shadowing exercises, doesn't know what a synonym is, doesn't know your vocabulary size – so it can't even try to help you in an interesting way, etc.

Then, community-maintained plugins make a very disjointed experience IMO. F. ex. a few years ago there was a good Forvo plugin, then one day stopped working, and that was it – no more plugin, end of the story.

What do you think about Anki? Are you a power user?

Thanks for the long reply - I'm a long term Anki user, more so out of having a process "that works", and that I'm used to, rather than it being some miracle tool.

What do you see as its strengths?

Exactly, I think many long terms users managed to create a setup and workflow that work for them, and they are just happy with that.
I'm sure there are many use cases that I am not aware of.

Anki pretty much popularized spaced repetition after all, much more than SuperMemo.

Hey, Prosemirror! That's cool.
I found one: create 2 nodes, select the second one, hit backspace:

Expected -> second node is deleted
Actual -> both nodes are deleted

Didn't try much else, thou

Oh right, it happens only if there is no space.
However I passed the technical test, he didn't see any problem 😄
I'll probably (aka more than 20% chance) make a demo of how we can make a AI canvas with Prosemirror, I'll ping you when it's done.

That's the gatekeeper, right? I hate with all my heart.
Apparently, the only real way to test it (according to Apple support) is to try it on a fresh VM each time.

Home
Search
Messages
Notifications
More