i think this would be outside the scope. also it would (i guess?) enforce people to write their todos more formal and not from the "i" perspective. and then again, you would have to implement some way to choose which todos you'd like to include in the changelog (surely not all, right?). i really feel like it would go against the current and good use of wip...
Yeah the underlying issue is that WIP is focused on sharing your progress with fellow makers, whereas a changelog is generally something you write for your customers. So while they might look similar, the ultimately serve a very different goal and require a different type of content.
Now for some users and products it might still work. If you happen to write nice, readable todo's and/or have a customer-base of makers. But those are the exceptions.
i think this would be outside the scope. also it would (i guess?) enforce people to write their todos more formal and not from the "i" perspective. and then again, you would have to implement some way to choose which todos you'd like to include in the changelog (surely not all, right?). i really feel like it would go against the current and good use of wip...
Yeah the underlying issue is that WIP is focused on sharing your progress with fellow makers, whereas a changelog is generally something you write for your customers. So while they might look similar, the ultimately serve a very different goal and require a different type of content.
Now for some users and products it might still work. If you happen to write nice, readable todo's and/or have a customer-base of makers. But those are the exceptions.