What about only allowing paid members to give free invites?
If people really like the community, they'll want to invite their friends - and they'll need to upgrade.
In addition, you can also have several paid features, such as creating discussions, roasts, etc.
More or less, only private tasks and chat would be free; ex. they wouldn't be able to. post /done to the main wipchat but only to their account - they can, on the other hand, engage in chat/discussions/roasts.
Nice, yes these are some great suggestions for pro-only features 👍
The only thing I want to be careful with is making "invites" a perk of being a paying member. As then people might feel entitled to get them, whereas I'd like to keep the option to be selective about who get to invited other members.
But it's definitely something we can experiment with
What about only allowing paid members to give free invites?
If people really like the community, they'll want to invite their friends - and they'll need to upgrade.
In addition, you can also have several paid features, such as creating discussions, roasts, etc.
More or less, only private tasks and chat would be free; ex. they wouldn't be able to. post /done to the main wipchat but only to their account - they can, on the other hand, engage in chat/discussions/roasts.
Nice, yes these are some great suggestions for pro-only features 👍
The only thing I want to be careful with is making "invites" a perk of being a paying member. As then people might feel entitled to get them, whereas I'd like to keep the option to be selective about who get to invited other members.
But it's definitely something we can experiment with