If "I" works, "we" works too, unless you explicitly want to brand yourself as the face of the company for a long time. This could be for the company or this could be to build your personal brand.
I'm really excited to do 100% of it myself. I plan on doing so going forward as well.
Depends on whether you hire contractors/part-timers or full time staff. If it's the former, they might not even want to be directly associated in name/public with your company. If this is your predominant mode, then "I" works well (and of course "we" too, as mentioned in the first line).
For 1, 2, 3:
This follows above. But, if you credit individuals, you could also consider crediting specific people (other than you) who did that work. Being able to build their brand also makes it easier to get people to work with you.
IMO, unless you want to grow into an agency/consultancy in the short term, using your own name is fine and good. You can always change the name later. By then you would have enough traction and re-branding is not as difficult.
If "I" works, "we" works too, unless you explicitly want to brand yourself as the face of the company for a long time. This could be for the company or this could be to build your personal brand.
Depends on whether you hire contractors/part-timers or full time staff. If it's the former, they might not even want to be directly associated in name/public with your company. If this is your predominant mode, then "I" works well (and of course "we" too, as mentioned in the first line).
For 1, 2, 3:
This follows above. But, if you credit individuals, you could also consider crediting specific people (other than you) who did that work. Being able to build their brand also makes it easier to get people to work with you.
IMO, unless you want to grow into an agency/consultancy in the short term, using your own name is fine and good. You can always change the name later. By then you would have enough traction and re-branding is not as difficult.
Cool, agree on all, thank you!